Skip to content
Wargaming from the Balcony
Menu
  • Home
  • Reports and Reviews
  • YouTube
  • Links
Menu

Battle of Sacile, April 1809.

Posted on January 30, 2020

Background

The Battle of Sacile (also known as the Battle of Fontana Fredda) on 16 April 1809 and its companion Clash at Pordenone on 15 April saw an Austrian army commanded by Archduke John of Austria defeat a Franco-Italian army led by Eugène de Beauharnais and force it to retreat. Sacile proved to be the most notable victory of John’s career. The action took place east of the Livenza River near Sacile in modern-day Italy during the War of the Fifth Coalition, part of the Napoleonic Wars.

In April 1809, Archduke John quickly invaded Venetia in northeastern Italy. On 15 April at Pordenone, the Austrian advance guard routed the French rear guard, inflicting heavy losses. Undeterred by this setback and believing he enjoyed a numerical superiority over his opponents, Eugène attacked the Austrians east of Sacile the following day. Though the two sides were equal in numbers of foot soldiers, the Austrians possessed a two-to-one advantage in cavalry, and this turned out to be a key factor in their victory.

Eugène withdrew his army 130 kilometres (81 mi) to a defensible position at Verona on the Adige river, where he reorganized his army and received reinforcements. At Verona, the Franco-Italian army was secure from Archduke John’s army advancing from the east and a second Austrian column threatening it from the Tyrol in the north. By the end of April, news of French victories in the Danube valley caused John to fall back to the east, with Eugène in pursuit.

The Franco-Italian army suffered 3,000 killed and wounded at Sacile. An additional 3,500 soldiers, 19 guns, 23 ammunition wagons, and two colors fell into the hands of the Austrians. Pagès was wounded and captured while Teste was wounded. According to Smith, the Austrians lost 2,617 killed and wounded, 532 captured, and 697 missing.  Schneid listed Austrian losses as 3,600 killed and wounded and 500 captured.

Eugène retreated to the Adige at Verona.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Sacile

The Game

In continuation of our battles of 1809 in Italy series, next on our list was Sacile. This battle is not too large, but easily fielded using Bloody Big Battles. One of my buddies set up the terrain based on the battle maps and figured out the OB for both forces using our normal game scale. 500 man per infantry base, 350 per cavalry base and 12 guns per battery.

Austrian Army

Archduke Johann

Volkmann
5 S P Trnd SM. IR53
4 A P Vet Cav Savoy Dragoons

Frimont -Adv Guard
4 Trnd SM IR52/IR62
4 2S Trnd SM 1st Banal Grenz
4 A Trnd Cav Hussars/Chevauleger
1 SA Adv Gd Arty

Albert Gyulai VIII Corps
4 A Trnd Cav 2nd/9th Hussars
6 Trnd SM P IR27
6 Trnd SM P IR61
5 Trnd SM P IR53
5 S Trnd SM P IR61/2nd Banal Grenz
1 SA P VIII corps Arty
1 SA P VIII corps Arty

Ignaz Gyulai IX Corps
6 Trnd SM P IR19
5 S Trnd SM P Oguliner Grenz
6 Trnd SM P IR43
4 S Trnd SM P Ottocac Grenz
6 Trnd SM P IR13
5 S Trnd SM P Szuliner Grenz
5 A Vet SM P Combined Grenadiers
3 A Trnd Cav P Hohenloe Dragoons
1 SA P IX corps Arty
1 SA P IX corps Arty

Franco Italian Army

Prince Eugene Seras 1st Div

6 S Vet SM 53rd Ligne
6 S Trnd SM 106th Ligne
3 Trnd Cav 6th Chasseurs
1 SA 1stDiv Arty

Broussier 2nd Div
6 S Vet SM 9th Ligne
6 S Vet SM 84th Ligne
5 S Trnd SM 92nd Ligne
3 Trnd Cav 25th Chasseurs
1 SA 2nd Div Arty

Grenier 3rd Div
5 S Vet SM 1st Ligne
6 S Vet SM 52nd Ligne
5 S Trnd SM 102nd Ligne
1 SA 3rd Div Arty

Barbou 5th Div
3 2S Vet SM 18th Legere
4 S Vet SM 5th Ligne
4 S Vet SM 23/81st Ligne
1 SA 5th Div Arty

Severoli 1st Italian Div
6 S Trnd SM 1st Italian Line
4 S Trnd SM 7th Italian Line
3 2S Trnd SM Dalmatian Rgt.
1 SA Italian Arty

Sahuc Lt Cav Div
3 Trnd Cav F 6/8th Hussars

The game would be 12 turns, with the side with the higher objective count would be the winner. Victory objective towns were assigned (I don’t remember what they were though!) and both sides set up. Both sides advanced, with the Austrians trying to force the right. The Austrians seemed to get off well initially, punishing the Franco Italians to their front, while protecting their left flank. The Franco Italians came on more evenly deployed and seemed to be wavering.

The Austrian columns were slowed down in the process of processing their attack. This grind did cause uneven casualties, but was not able to break the Franco Italians before their reserves marched into position to stabilize the front. The Austrians were in position for one last push to break the thin Franco Italian line. However, their commanders lost their nerve (poor command rolls) and Prince Eugene’s forces held the line! An unhistorical loss for the Austrians! Uncle Napi would be very happy!

  • Mantueffel

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Categories

  • Battle Report
  • Hobby
  • Museums and Battlefields
  • Opinions
  • Reviews
  • Tactics
  • Uncategorized

Tags

19th Century (11) Africa (38) Austrian (49) AWI (14) British (119) Dwarves (17) East Front (67) Epic (18) F&I (29) Fantasy (57) Fantasy Battle (172) Flames of War (267) FOW (283) French (88) German (175) Historical (596) Horse and Musket (194) Italian (43) Japanese (26) LotR (12) Magic (24) Mediterranean (17) Napoleonics (51) Naval (16) North America (22) Oathmark (14) Pacific (25) Prussian (40) Pulp (94) Rules (122) Russian (22) Saxony (11) Sci-Fi (104) Soviet (75) Star Wars (59) SYW (29) T9A (137) Terrain (186) USA (95) Warhammer (119) WAS (18) West Front (64) WWI (15) WWII (254) YouTube (130)

Recent Posts

  • 28mm First Relief of Lucknow, 1857.
  • 15mm Mexican American War, US Volunteers and Specialist Infantry.
  • Tyndall’s Point, Gloucester Point Battlefield Park.
  • Williamsburg Muster, 2026.
  • 15mm Mexican American War – US Regular Infantry.

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016

Recent Comments

  • redcaer1690 on 15mm Mexican American War – US Artillery.
  • redcaer1690 on 15mm Mexican American War, US Volunteers and Specialist Infantry.
  • lorenzoseventh on 15mm Mexican American War – US Regular Infantry.
  • Andrew John Fuller on 15mm Mexica American War – US Cavalry and Commanders.
  • Manteuffel on Lion Rampant – Battle of Manzikert, August 1071.
©2026 Wargaming from the Balcony | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme